Philosophy—A Waste of Time?

A lot of smart people claim that philosophy is a waste of time.   Stephen Hawking claims that philosophy is dead.  And no doubt there are obscure highly abstract corners of the world of philosophy that are arguably mental masturbation with little in the way of valuable application.

This misses the point.

Philosophy is not in the class of things to which we can appraise the value of time and mental effort expended in their pursuit, concluding that they are valuable or a “waste”.  Philosophy is inextricably intertwined in every valuation we make.  Ironically, you have to do philosophy to appraise it.  Calling philosophy a waste is like saying, “Words are meaningless.”  The very assertion undermines itself.

We can’t not do philosophy.

You do philosophy a little bit in almost every decision you make and every conclusion you draw.  Every time you determine that something is “good”, “bad”, “right”, “wrong”, “valuable”, “worthless”, “virtuous”, “evil”, “true”, or “untrue” you are doing philosophy.  You do philosophy virtually continuously in every waking moment.

Every assertion of value begs the question “why?”  If your philosophy is sound, you will be prepared to answer that question.  But if you are not prepared to answer then you cling to a philosophy that you cannot defend.

Typically those who dismiss “philosophy” as a “waste of time” are those who are are happy with their particular philosophy and do not wish to expend the mental energy contending with scrutiny.

It’s not a question of the value of philosophy.  It’s a question of the value of your philosophy.

    • KINGlebronJames
    • June 25th, 2012 11:26am

    My philosophy is this: Stephen Hawking was not referring to philosophy in the way you are referring to it. You are talking about philosophy in the broadest way there is. You are saying that everything is philosophy, which, technically, it is. But Stephen Hawking is saying that focused philosophy is dead, the type of philosophy that was carried out in earlier times. There are currently very few “Philosophers” whom actually are philosophers (that’s their job). I think thats what Stephen Hawking was trying to say. Thats my philosophy :)

    • KINGlebronJames
    • July 4th, 2012 4:23am

    this philosophy is a waste of time writing this.

  1. A waste of time, eh? Well let’s not waste time philosophizing, but I have to ask: what makes a thing a waste of time? Perhaps theoretical physics will tell us?

    Stephen Hawking is idolized by a class of people who see the scientist as the sage of the modern age. These types pat each other on the back for being too smart, too skeptical, and too “scientific” to fall for religion, mysticism, and superstition. Yet they embrace passionate ethical and aesthetic persuasions and principles that they present to the world as real, true, and objective. They have absolutely no skepticism whatsoever with regard to the validity of these components that are core to their person.

    This absence of skepticism demonstrates—not a lack of philosophy—but very bad philosophy.

    I get that science has progressed to the point that some fields of inquiry that were once relegated to philosophical deliberation have graduated to the level of real observable phenomena. But the most science can do is discover and describe causality. That discovery can never validate an assertion of universal principle such as “that behavior is wrong” or “that behavior is just”. Yet these worshippers of science and skepticism never bother to question themselves on these matters.

    Either Hawking is incredibly narrow-minded in actually believing that “philosophy is dead”, or his meaning is unclear and irresponsible; many of his admirers are already inclined to dismiss philosophy as a “waste of time” because science is so much more interesting, and frankly much less threatening. Hawking’s assertion will be sufficient to persuade many “scientific, atheist, and skeptical” types to cling to their unsubstantiated philosophical positions uncritically, while they hypocritically ridicule the religious and the superstitious for their unsubstantiated positions.

    Hawking’s statement only serves to discourage critical inquiry.

    • Josh
    • September 12th, 2013 7:09pm

    Philsophy has been incorrectly categorisied as a subject worthy of a University degree, a degree in a topic where there are no certaintys where everything is open to question where there is no correct or incorrect answer. While philsophy can make for some interesting discussions its application to todays world is null and void. The problem is as with all things that those people who have taken up the Phylosophy batten do not like to be told what they have studied and the degree they have received is really about nothing of tangible value or application.

    So we have a group of people who argue its importance and its relavence.

    It is not philosphy that enables us to question, it is not philosophy that causes us to decide something is inhumane, it is not phylosophy that shapes our moral or ethical standards. Unless of course everyone is in fact borne a philospher in which case why do we give people who study the topic any recognition as having achieved anything out of the ordinary.

    I have a degree in Philosophy and while it was an intertesting and was a good way to get credits towards my final degree as the study is ridiculously simple and easy, it simply has no useful application.

    Philosphy taught me nothing.

    It opened my eyes to a way to get money for having an idea and simply applying a logical thought priocess.

    We truly need to put Phylosophy in its rightful place.

    • Roger Mutt
    • October 15th, 2013 8:52am

    A pursuit is a waste of time iff engaging in that pursuit does not allow one to realize one or more of one’s felt desires. Holler.

    • Helen
    • September 5th, 2014 2:39pm

    As a born philosopher I have been asking questions pretty much 24/7 ( maybe take out time when I’m asleep, but only ‘Maybe’! )since I remember being conscious! I considered doing an open university course when my youngest child was going to university. I asked my father ( another born philosopher ) what he thought of the idea and I sensed some doubt , more by a sixth sense than anything he said. He suggested I get some relevant books first before making a decision which I did. I found them so anal and really did feel that they weren’t something to put my time into. I have always been searching and love to read books /ideas written by ‘wise’ people… Jo Campbell comes to mind. I’m sure there are deeply fascinating philosophy books/ courses out there but my initial feeling is that we are all seeking on our own journeys and I like to find the revelations, wisdom through my own searching …not be told about them second hand. As a musician, composer and clarinettist, I feel that there is much that is unsaid, things we know without ‘knowing’ that we know them. It’s a big subject!

    • Matt
    • March 2nd, 2015 4:06pm

    So a friend’s fb post asked us to try writing our first name followed by .com to see what happens. I end up finding this awesome blog and another Matt with a passion for philosophy. Kind of surreal.

  1. No trackbacks yet.